This is the text (more or less) of a speech I gave last night at Toastmasters.
It was an ordinary day. I woke up late with a massive hangover, dashed to work, ducked into the ladies to tidy my hair and found my comb was missing.
Now, there are two things about that morning - one strange and one annoying.
The strange thing was that I had a hangover. True, I had been at a works party the previous night – old Professor Farnsworth’s leaving do - but I was sure I'd only drunk lemon and lime all night. My memories were strangely hazy though.
The annoying thing was that my comb was missing. I was annoyed about that because I hate losing things generally and it had been a gift from an old friend.
Anyway, it couldn’t be helped, so I smoothed my hair as best I could, and got on with my day.
This was my first job. I was a lab assistant at the prestigious Wissenschaftler Institute for Genetic Research, not far from here.
Then a few days later, my supervisor told me to take Professor Wissenshaftler his afternoon tea. This was exciting and scary as I hadn’t met him before.
I knocked politely, entered and set down the tray. As I did so, I noticed something sticking out from a pile of papers on his desk.
My Comb!
He’d. Got. My. Comb.
I wanted to ask him about it, but I was very young, very nervous and he was a very intimating figure –a sort of dyspeptic Albert Einstein with the kind of hairstyle you get by sticking your fingers in a plug socket.
So I didn’t dare.
I decided to wait until everyone had gone home and then get it back.
Eventually the time came. I peeped out and sure enough all was deserted, dark and silent. I crept to the professor’s office. Luckily, it wasn’t locked and I was soon once more in possession of my precious comb.
I turned and hurried back out.
It could have been the dark, it could have been my unfamiliarity with the place or even my giddy euphoria at getting the comb back, but I must have gone through the wrong door from the office because I now found myself in a different lab entirely.
I turned round to retrace my steps, but the door had clicked shut behind me and for some reason didn’t open from this side.
In the dimness, I could just make out a door and window at the other end of the room. I hurried over. In case it was a dead end I risked a quick peep through the window to see what lay beyond.
And nearly fell over backwards when a pale face suddenly appeared on the other side of the glass.
I gasped in shock!
It wasn’t just a face it, was MY face!
Then I laughed. The “window” was obviously a mirror, of course. It’s your own reflection, idiot! I told myself. Phew!
When my “reflection” started banging on the glass and shouting Get me out of here, I almost fainted. I rushed to the door and unbolted it.
My double emerged.
She really was just like me. If you’re born a twin you’re probably used to seeing your double, but suddenly to become a twin is eerie to say the least.
She really was my double - even wearing the same green scrubs that we were obliged to wear in the lab.
We had just a few moments to ponder this before all of sudden the lights came on.
“What do you think you’re doing here?” came an angry voice from the doorway behind me. It was professor W, and he had a gun pointed at us.
“I got lost,“ I said lamely.
“Well now you have to die!”
“What?” I cried, “I was just getting my comb back. Can’t you just give me a written warning or something?”
“No, you have discovered my illegal secret human cloning experiment”. He readied the gun.
“Wish I’d not bothered about that blasted comb now.” I said.
“What?” he said.
“The comb I bet you stole from me to get my DNA – I saw it on your desk and was just trying to get it back.”
“You imbecile!” he laughed. “I didn’t take your comb, you dropped it at Farnsworth’s leaving do, I kept meaning to give it back to you.”
“Oh”
“Besides, I needed more than a few stupid hairs. I drugged your drinks at the leaving party, took the samples I needed then popped you back into bed at your house, none the wiser. Now stick out your right thumbs!”
“Why?” we cried in unison.
“Because I only need the original one of you to continue the experiment and I can spot the clone by the extra thumb joint I gave it.”
“But you must know which is which,” I said, “I’m the original, the one that’s been living out in the world, she’s the clone, surely!”
“Not necessarily,” said the prof. “I had a few drinkies at that party myself and can’t remember which of you I kept and which I took back home. The clone has an extra thumb joint. Now stick em out!”
We extended our trembling thumbs and he looked at them for a moment before raising the gun.
I snatched up a nearby Bunsen burner and hurled it at his head as he fired.
The shot went wild and smashed into a bunch of chemical jars which promptly exploded. There was a blinding flash and a thunderous roar. I felt myself flung across the room and everything went black.
I woke up in hospital with concussion and no major injuries other than a crushed right hand. A concret beam had fallen on it apparently. The surgeons fixed it up almost perfectly – apart from the thumb.
They said the explosion at the lab was a gas leak and even though the ruins were carefully searched, no trace of the professor or my twin was ever found.
So, am I the original me – with a broken thumb?
Or am I a clone – complete with the professor’s modification?
Even I’m not sure now.
All I can say is:
I can do THIS with my thumb.
(reveal strangely bendy thumb)
END
This is my actual thumb and it does bend back in an odd way. It does this because as a child I used to make a kind of bridge with my hand on the table and lean my head on it when reading. Over the years of pressing down, the joint acquired a larger range of movement.
That's not as interesting though.
What all this does demonstrate I think, is that you can make a story out of just about anything.
Thursday, 31 May 2012
Monday, 21 May 2012
A Little Optimism
Not to try and be too diabetes-inducingly sweet or anything, but it strikes me that cats are a lot happier than people most of the time.
Jus' sayin'.
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
Gob-Stopper
This came out of nowhere this morning.
Gob-Stopper
Gob-Stopper
The thought of leaving here,
Leaving you,
Leaving this life,
Rolls around my head.
Like a brand-new gob-stopper.
It holds the promise of long sweetness.
It has not yet lost its bright colour.
But it’s still too big to swallow.
Maybe I’ll just suck on it for a while.
Feel it click against my teeth,
And when it’s small enough.
It’ll go down easy.
Not sure what our American friends call gob-stoppers. They're a big ball of hard candy you suck on, they change colour as you suck. They have a kind of aniseed-y flavour, usually.
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
Blessed Are the Meek
Recently, I was asked to write a short meditation on one of the Beatitudes. This was the best I could do, cynic that I am.
Blessed Are the Meek
Blessed Are the Meek
Blessed, you say.
Blessed?
Blessed, because I stand aside while others get their way?
Blessed, because I put their needs first?
Blessed, because I can’t say ‘no’?
Blessed, because I don’t blow my own trumpet
Even though I do have a few good tunes?
Blessed are the doormats, for they shall be trodden on.
I just hope the Earth is worth it.
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
A New Home in the Sky - So THAT's why he gets the big bucks!
Le Boss sashays into the office and up to my desk.
“Can you do me a favour,” he asks. Tiny tinkling alarm bells begin to sound in the empty, echoing recesses of my mind.
“Maybe,” I say as guardedly as if I were surrounded by a 10-foot-tall barbed-wire fence, a dozen machine gun nests and a regiment of Gurkhas. “What is it?”
“Can you take my place on a conference call tomorrow morning?”
“Probably, what’s it about?”
“It’s to do with the Honest Bob the Plumbers contract.” Now, we do a managed service thing for HBtP: call centre, website, etc. This is not my area at all; I only know from Klueless Support; I talk to machines all day, not people.
“But I don’t know anything about that,” I point out.
“Don’t worry,” he replies, “Just go on the call and listen to what everyone’s saying. You won’t need to do or say anything or make any decisions.”
I make a “what-the-flip?” face at him.
“It’s what I always do.” He says, and wanders off to find the kettle or engage in some other similarly critical, high-flying activity..
This is why he's paid more than me, obviously.
“Can you do me a favour,” he asks. Tiny tinkling alarm bells begin to sound in the empty, echoing recesses of my mind.
“Maybe,” I say as guardedly as if I were surrounded by a 10-foot-tall barbed-wire fence, a dozen machine gun nests and a regiment of Gurkhas. “What is it?”
“Can you take my place on a conference call tomorrow morning?”
“Probably, what’s it about?”
“It’s to do with the Honest Bob the Plumbers contract.” Now, we do a managed service thing for HBtP: call centre, website, etc. This is not my area at all; I only know from Klueless Support; I talk to machines all day, not people.
“But I don’t know anything about that,” I point out.
“Don’t worry,” he replies, “Just go on the call and listen to what everyone’s saying. You won’t need to do or say anything or make any decisions.”
I make a “what-the-flip?” face at him.
“It’s what I always do.” He says, and wanders off to find the kettle or engage in some other similarly critical, high-flying activity..
This is why he's paid more than me, obviously.
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
More Magnifier Mumblings
I have written before about a software magnifier for the computer screen (you can read the piece here, if you so wish).
I thought at the time that the open source magnifier I had found was the bee’s knees, and, in fact, it was a very useful tool. As I continued to use it, however, I began to notice a few annoying quirks. Sometimes, for example, the movement of the’lens’ around the screen would become very jerky, which was very distracting. Also, the image quality degraded somewhat as the magnification increased (not hugely surprising, but not exactly desirable either).
So I more or less stopped using it.
Recently, I had occasion to buy a new mouse, as my old one kept acting like it was possessed by the devil, jumping around the screen on its own and so on.
I duly dispatched the Other Half to the local mouse emporium and he came back with a Microsoft mouse – a Wireless Mobile Mouse 3500 – to be precise.
Reading though the quick-start guide that came with it, I noticed that you could configure the scroll wheel so that if you clicked it, it invoked a magnifier. Sounded good, but I was never impressed with the magnifier that comes with Windows because it just gives you a fixed window which does not move around the screen with the mouse, which was the thing I wanted. I thought I'd try it out anyway, just in case.
Wow!
The magnifier (presumably a doctored version of the actual Windows one, but which moves around the screen with the mouse) is brilliant.
The image quality is excellent, and the movement so far has been flawlessly silky-smooth every time. You can toggle the magnifier off and on just by clicking the scroll wheel. With the open source one, you have to press CTRL-ALT-G on the keyboard to achieve the same effect.
You can also vary the size of the ‘lens’ by holding down the scroll wheel for a short time, whereupon you can drag the window border to the size you desire. A larger 'lens' appears to give a larger magnification too (or it could just be my imagination).
This handy functionality is actually provided by the Microsoft Intellipoint mouse driver and I imagine anyone using this driver, regardless of the type of mouse, could configure their mouse to make use of it. I did try to see if I could achieve the same effect with a non-iltellipoint driver, but it did not work.
OK, I appreciate that screen magnification is probably of only tangential interest to most people but, if you’re getting on a bit and find reading the screen more of a struggle than you used to, this represents a fairly low-cost (my mouse was less than £30) visual aid.
I thought at the time that the open source magnifier I had found was the bee’s knees, and, in fact, it was a very useful tool. As I continued to use it, however, I began to notice a few annoying quirks. Sometimes, for example, the movement of the’lens’ around the screen would become very jerky, which was very distracting. Also, the image quality degraded somewhat as the magnification increased (not hugely surprising, but not exactly desirable either).
So I more or less stopped using it.
Recently, I had occasion to buy a new mouse, as my old one kept acting like it was possessed by the devil, jumping around the screen on its own and so on.
I duly dispatched the Other Half to the local mouse emporium and he came back with a Microsoft mouse – a Wireless Mobile Mouse 3500 – to be precise.
Reading though the quick-start guide that came with it, I noticed that you could configure the scroll wheel so that if you clicked it, it invoked a magnifier. Sounded good, but I was never impressed with the magnifier that comes with Windows because it just gives you a fixed window which does not move around the screen with the mouse, which was the thing I wanted. I thought I'd try it out anyway, just in case.
Wow!
The magnifier (presumably a doctored version of the actual Windows one, but which moves around the screen with the mouse) is brilliant.
The image quality is excellent, and the movement so far has been flawlessly silky-smooth every time. You can toggle the magnifier off and on just by clicking the scroll wheel. With the open source one, you have to press CTRL-ALT-G on the keyboard to achieve the same effect.
You can also vary the size of the ‘lens’ by holding down the scroll wheel for a short time, whereupon you can drag the window border to the size you desire. A larger 'lens' appears to give a larger magnification too (or it could just be my imagination).
This handy functionality is actually provided by the Microsoft Intellipoint mouse driver and I imagine anyone using this driver, regardless of the type of mouse, could configure their mouse to make use of it. I did try to see if I could achieve the same effect with a non-iltellipoint driver, but it did not work.
OK, I appreciate that screen magnification is probably of only tangential interest to most people but, if you’re getting on a bit and find reading the screen more of a struggle than you used to, this represents a fairly low-cost (my mouse was less than £30) visual aid.
Friday, 17 February 2012
Ludic Listening
I love reading. Now, before you get the wrong idea, this is NOT going to be a post eulogising the joys of relaxing with a good book; we all know that’s a very satisfying and calming thing to do, so ‘nuff said.
No, as I said, I love reading, but of late it’s becoming more and more difficult. I used to be able to spend several languid hours at a stretch with my nose between the covers and my mind off somewhere completely else. Now (I suppose it’s a function of aging) my eyes just can’t sustain that level of concentration – not to mention the monkey in my head that won’t sit still for anything, curse him!
So, reluctantly, I have turned to audio books. I say ‘reluctantly’ because in the back of my mind, on a high shelf next to the Bumper Box of Regrets, there’s a nasty little idea that having a book read to you is cheating somehow; little kids have stories read to them, not adults – at least not adults that can see.
This is nonsense of course; that venerable institution, BBC Radio Four, has ‘Book of the Week’ and ‘Book at Bedtime’ which is exactly that – someone reading a story. Radio Four is definitely not a station for children.
Anyway, I’ve started listening to audio books and have discovered a few ways that they are actually better (dare I say it) that reading a print book.
You can enjoy the story while you are doing other things like cooking, exercising, doing a crossword or constructing a scale model of St Paul’s Cathedral out of matchsticks.
Sometimes, the makers will add a little music here and there which can, if done properly, really enhance the atmosphere of the story. With a print book, you’d have to add this for yourself in your head and who thinks to do that?
The reader, if they’ve been well chosen, can bring the story to life with just a few differences in emphasis or vocal tone and pitch. Actually, here’s a question: when you are reading to yourself, do you ‘hear’ your voice in your head reading the story or do the words just somehow flow into your head and create meaning? I personally ‘read’ to myself. My husband does not and, as a result, sometimes does not see puns and other word-play jokes in the text. What do you do?
More than one person can enjoy the story at the same time. My hubs and I are currently working our way through a series of audio books – The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher – and it is so gratifying to turn off the TV and just sit quietly together listening and responding to the stories. This is a bit harder with a print book!
Recommendations:
Any of the Jeeves & Wooster stories by P G Wodehouse as read by Jonathan Cecil. These are just hilarious!
The Harry Potter books as read by the ubiquitous Stephen Fry. Mr Fry’s rich, plummy voice is just right for these and there’s loads more detail in the books than the films. I’m fairly sure I don’t have to explain the whole Harry Potter thing by now.
The aforementioned Dresden Files books as read by James Marsters (Spike from 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer'). These are also about a wizard called Harry, but one who happens to be the only Wizard Private Investigator listed in Chicago’s phone book. The world that the author describes in these stories is our own, complete with mobile phones, cars, guns, etc. The stories are fast-paced and tightly plotted. Harry Dresden and the other main characters are sympathetic and believable. Well worth a go in print or in audio form. Mr Marsters’s vocal talents are just perfect for this gritty series.
So yeah, I love reading, but now I’m learning to love listening too.
No, as I said, I love reading, but of late it’s becoming more and more difficult. I used to be able to spend several languid hours at a stretch with my nose between the covers and my mind off somewhere completely else. Now (I suppose it’s a function of aging) my eyes just can’t sustain that level of concentration – not to mention the monkey in my head that won’t sit still for anything, curse him!
So, reluctantly, I have turned to audio books. I say ‘reluctantly’ because in the back of my mind, on a high shelf next to the Bumper Box of Regrets, there’s a nasty little idea that having a book read to you is cheating somehow; little kids have stories read to them, not adults – at least not adults that can see.
This is nonsense of course; that venerable institution, BBC Radio Four, has ‘Book of the Week’ and ‘Book at Bedtime’ which is exactly that – someone reading a story. Radio Four is definitely not a station for children.
Anyway, I’ve started listening to audio books and have discovered a few ways that they are actually better (dare I say it) that reading a print book.
You can enjoy the story while you are doing other things like cooking, exercising, doing a crossword or constructing a scale model of St Paul’s Cathedral out of matchsticks.
Sometimes, the makers will add a little music here and there which can, if done properly, really enhance the atmosphere of the story. With a print book, you’d have to add this for yourself in your head and who thinks to do that?
The reader, if they’ve been well chosen, can bring the story to life with just a few differences in emphasis or vocal tone and pitch. Actually, here’s a question: when you are reading to yourself, do you ‘hear’ your voice in your head reading the story or do the words just somehow flow into your head and create meaning? I personally ‘read’ to myself. My husband does not and, as a result, sometimes does not see puns and other word-play jokes in the text. What do you do?
More than one person can enjoy the story at the same time. My hubs and I are currently working our way through a series of audio books – The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher – and it is so gratifying to turn off the TV and just sit quietly together listening and responding to the stories. This is a bit harder with a print book!
Recommendations:
Any of the Jeeves & Wooster stories by P G Wodehouse as read by Jonathan Cecil. These are just hilarious!
The Harry Potter books as read by the ubiquitous Stephen Fry. Mr Fry’s rich, plummy voice is just right for these and there’s loads more detail in the books than the films. I’m fairly sure I don’t have to explain the whole Harry Potter thing by now.
The aforementioned Dresden Files books as read by James Marsters (Spike from 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer'). These are also about a wizard called Harry, but one who happens to be the only Wizard Private Investigator listed in Chicago’s phone book. The world that the author describes in these stories is our own, complete with mobile phones, cars, guns, etc. The stories are fast-paced and tightly plotted. Harry Dresden and the other main characters are sympathetic and believable. Well worth a go in print or in audio form. Mr Marsters’s vocal talents are just perfect for this gritty series.
So yeah, I love reading, but now I’m learning to love listening too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)